Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO<sub>2</sub> Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas

杨宏军; 樊栓狮; 郎雪梅; 王燕鸿; 聂江华

doi:10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60031-1

Your Location：

Home >

Browse articles >

Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas

Updated：2026-01-06

- Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas
- Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas
- 中国化学工程学报（英文版） 2011年19卷第4期页码：615-620
- Affiliations：
  
  Key Laboratory of Enhanced Heat Transfer and Energy Conservation, Ministry of Education, South China University of Technology,Guangzhou,China,510640
- Author bio：
- Funds：
  
  Supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2007AA03Z229);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2009ZM0185)
- DOI：10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60031-1
  中图分类号：
- 纸质出版：2011
- Accepted：
Scan QR Code
杨宏军, 樊栓狮, 郎雪梅, 等. Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas[J]. 中国化学工程学报（英文版）, 2011,19(4):615-620. DOI: 10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60031-1.

Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas [J]. , 2011, 19(4): 615-620.
杨宏军, 樊栓狮, 郎雪梅, 等. Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas[J]. 中国化学工程学报（英文版）, 2011,19(4):615-620. DOI: 10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60031-1. DOI：

Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas [J]. , 2011, 19(4): 615-620. DOI： 10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60031-1.

摘要

Three gas separation technologies

chemical absorption

membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption

are usually applied for CO

capture from flue gas in coal-fired power plants.In this work

the costs of the three technologies are analyzed and compared.The cost for chemical absorption is mainly from

$30 to $60 per ton(based on CO

avoided)

while the minimum value is $10 per ton(based on CO

avoided).As for membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption

the costs are $50 to $78 and $40 to $63 per ton(based on CO

avoided)

respectively.Measures are proposed to reduce the cost of the three technologies.For CO

capture and storage process

the CO

recovery and purity should be greater than 90%.Based on the cost

recovery

and purity

it seems that chemical absorption is currently the most cost-effective technology for CO

capture from flue gas from power plants.However

membrane gas separation is the most promising alternative approach in the future

provided that membrane performance is further improved.

Abstract

Three gas separation technologies

chemical absorption

membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption

are usually applied for CO

capture from flue gas in coal-fired power plants.In this work

the costs of the three technologies are analyzed and compared.The cost for chemical absorption is mainly from 30 to 60 per ton(based on CO

avoided)

while the minimum value is 10 per ton(based on CO

avoided).As for membrane separation and pressure swing adsorption

the costs are 50 to 78 and 40 to 63 per ton(based on CO

avoided)

respectively.Measures are proposed to reduce the cost of the three technologies.For CO

capture and storage process

the CO

recovery and purity should be greater than 90%.Based on the cost

recovery

and purity

it seems that chemical absorption is currently the most cost-effective technology for CO

capture from flue gas from power plants.However

membrane gas separation is the most promising alternative approach in the future

provided that membrane performance is further improved.

关键词

Keywords

references

浏览量

5179

Downloads

CSCD

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

工具集

关联资源

C3H8 synergistic flue gas (CO2+N2) replacement of CH4 hydrate

Oxygen distribution in bed and safety analysis during hydrogen purification process from oxygen-containing feed gas

Nitric oxide removal from flue gas coupled with the FeIIEDTA regeneration by ultraviolet irradiation

Multiobjective economic model predictive control using utopia-tracking for the wet flue gas desulphurization system

Improving the energy efficiency of surface dielectric barrier discharge devices for plasma nitric oxide conversion utilizing active flow control

Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO2 Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas

Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO2 Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas

DOI：10.1016/S1004-9541(11)60031-1

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Keywords

references

Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas

Economic Comparison of Three Gas Separation Technologies for CO₂ Capture from Power Plant Flue Gas