Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design
Energy, Resources and Environmental Technology|Updated:2026-01-06
|
Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design
Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design
中国化学工程学报(英文版)2019年27卷第7期 页码:1690-1698
Affiliations:
1. University of Niš, Faculty of Technology, Bulevar oslobodenja 124, Leskovac 16000, Serbia
2. Research & Development Center “Alfatec”, Bulevar Nikole Tesle 63/5, Niš 18000, Serbia
Author bio:
Funds:
DOI:
中图分类号:
纸质出版:2019
Accepted:
Scan QR Code
Vlada B. Veljkovi?, Ana V. Veli?kovi?, Jelena M. Avramovi?, 等. Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design[J]. 中国化学工程学报(英文版), 2019,27(7):1690-1698.
Vlada B. Veljkovi?, Ana V. Veli?kovi?, Jelena M. Avramovi?, Olivera S. Stamenkovi?. Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(7): 1690-1698.
Vlada B. Veljkovi?, Ana V. Veli?kovi?, Jelena M. Avramovi?, 等. Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design[J]. 中国化学工程学报(英文版), 2019,27(7):1690-1698.DOI:
Vlada B. Veljkovi?, Ana V. Veli?kovi?, Jelena M. Avramovi?, Olivera S. Stamenkovi?. Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design[J]. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2019, 27(7): 1690-1698.DOI:
Modeling of biodiesel production: Performance comparison of Box-Behnken, face central composite and full factorial design
摘要
Abstract
The performances of the response surface methodology (RSM) in connection with the Box-Behnken
face central composite or full factorial design (BBD
FCCD or FFD
respectively) were compared for the use in modeling of the NaOH-catalyzed sunflower oil ethanolysis. The influence of temperature
catalyst loading
and ethanol-to-oil molar ratio (EOMR) on fatty acid ethyl esters (FAEE) content was evaluated. All three multivariate strategies were efficient in the statistical modeling and optimization of the influential process variables but BBD and FCCD realization involved less number of experiments
generating smaller costs
requiring less work and consuming shorter time than the corresponding FFD. All three designs resulted in the same optimal catalyst loading (1.25% of oil) and EOMR (12:1). The reduced two-factorinteraction (2FI) models based on the BBD and FCCD defined a range of optimal reaction temperature (25℃-75℃) and 25℃
respectively while the same model based on the 3
3
FFD appointed 75℃. The predicted FAEE content of about 97%-98.0% was close to the experimentally obtained FAEE content of about 97.0%-97.6% under the optimal rea
ction conditions. Therefore
the simpler BBD or FCCD might successfully be applied for statistical modeling of biodiesel production processes instead of the more extensive
more laborious and more expensive FFD.
关键词
Keywords
references
The trial reading is over, you can activate your VIP account to continue reading.